| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se> To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:18:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim5jwZGANVCmTb5h+MA=kys0khapznt_vrgC+N6@mail.gmail.com> Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org > I don't think "canonical tlhIngan Hol for klin zha" is a well-formed > concept. Klin zha is a *Klingonaase* term. I'm not quite sure that I follow you. "tree" is an English term, and «Sor» is a canonical tlhIngan Hol word for it. "Terra" is a Terran term, and «tera'» is a canonical tlhIngan Hol word for it. Likewise, as I see it, «tlhInja» - if canon - would be a canonical tlhIngan Hol word for the Klingonaase term "klin zha".
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |