[885] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Poem-- qabej
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri May 14 20:14:02 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Fri, 14 May 93 15:27:25 -0400
>>(Quch 'IHqu vIghajmo' {{;-)
>Quch QuchmoH 'oH'a'? (just in case: "is it a happy-making/cheering
>forehead?) {{{-)
Oh my. Now we're *really* gonna have some controversy about 4.4
{{:-) We already had the discussion about whether or not we could
put -be' on an adjectival verb. What about -moH? Is Quch QuchmoH
legal or does it have to be QuchmoHbogh Quch? At this point I'm not
even sure I wanna venture an opinion. {{:-)
'ach, HIja', QuchmoHbogh Quch 'oHbej. 'e' DaSovpu', mark. vItuQtaH
'e' Dalegh 'ej jIH muQuchmoHba'! {{:-)
naDev Quch ghaj 'Iv? ghaj DrujIv 'e' vISov... 'Iv latlh?
--Qanqor