[87778] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: KLBC: tlhIngan qeq
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Terrence Donnelly)
Wed Feb 3 10:07:15 2010
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:04:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
(It's unclear to me if quvar was intending to suggest corrections or let these stand on their own. As the last BG, I'll take the liberty of responding. If I have overstepped my bounds, please excuse me and let me know.)
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, kff@sics.se <kff@sics.se> wrote:
> QInlIj vIHev 'e' vIquv!
> (I am honored to receive your message)
>
Since {quv} 'be honored' doesn't take objects, this should be
QInlIj vIHevmo' jIquv
(note the "no object" verb prefix on {quv})
[pe'...] Mostly good, but watch the capitalization of 'I'
>
> 'oHmey DaghItlhpu'bogh 'oHmey vIghItlhbogh ghap?
> (Those you wrote or those I write?)
>
The "plural" of {'oH} is {bIH}, but stylistically, I'd probably just repeat {mu'tlhegh}, since we know Klingons don't mind repetition.
>
> /buSwI'
maj. batlh DaghItlh.
-- ter'eS
