[87410] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon Draydels
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Krenath)
Wed Dec 2 12:52:06 2009
From: Krenath <krenath@gmail.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <f1d476f10912020907v3eef2e88r792231d9a859269d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:49:30 -0500
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Fortunately, in pIqaD, p, b, gh, and Q are quite distinctive.
And if we're going to this much effort, why not pIqaD? :)
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:07 PM, "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael Roney, Jr.
> <nahqun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So if I were to label a draydel in pIqaD, they'd still be able to
>> play.
>>
>> Now before I get started, has anyone done this yet?
>
> I've not actually made one, but many years ago I came up with this:
>
> "pa' QuDmo' bechchu' ghol} "The opponent suffered completely because
> of the insurrection there."
>
> pa' :: p :: pagh (nothing)
> QuDmo' :: Q :: Qapla' (success)
> bechchu' :: b :: bID (half)
> ghol :: gh :: ghaq (contribute)
>
> It occurs to me that {p} and {b} are just similar enough to confuse
> people the way nun and gimel sometimes do. :)
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>
