[87408] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon Draydels
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Wed Dec 2 12:09:13 2009
In-Reply-To: <4b1690c8.5444f10a.095e.012e@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:07:18 -0500
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael Roney, Jr. <nahqun@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if I were to label a draydel in pIqaD, they'd still be able to play.
>
> Now before I get started, has anyone done this yet?
I've not actually made one, but many years ago I came up with this:
"pa' QuDmo' bechchu' ghol} "The opponent suffered completely because
of the insurrection there."
pa' :: p :: pagh (nothing)
QuDmo' :: Q :: Qapla' (success)
bechchu' :: b :: bID (half)
ghol :: gh :: ghaq (contribute)
It occurs to me that {p} and {b} are just similar enough to confuse
people the way nun and gimel sometimes do. :)
-- ghunchu'wI'
