[87269] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Usage of -Ha'

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Sat Nov 28 13:30:02 2009

Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:27:00 -0500
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <88242E11-D834-4FCB-BE1B-1E2CFFA5F345@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

ghunchu'wI' wrote:

>> It gives the verb a sense of either "undo" or "do wrongly."
> 
> We also often find Marc Okrand pointing out that {-Ha'} can imply a  
> change of state, even without an associated {-choH}.

Right, in the sense that a "done" state must have existed before it was 
undone. This differs from verbs with {-choH} in that with {-Ha'} the 
action is not about changing state; it's simply an implied consequence 
of the current state.

-- 
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post