[86846] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Yet another newbie!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tracy Canfield)
Fri Nov 13 13:11:31 2009
In-Reply-To: <4AFD9C5C.6090703@sics.se>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:08:57 -0500
From: Tracy Canfield <toastrix@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Since -Hom isn't merely "small", but "minor", perhaps "fine print"
could be handled as
mu'HomHey
"apparently minor words".
2009/11/13 Karl-Filip Faxen <kff@sics.se>:
> Tracy Canfield wrote:
>> 2009/11/13 Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>:
>>
>>>>I do not think I got it right, I think it should be:
>>>> {mu'Hom laDlu'taHviS yeplu'qu'niS}
>>>
>>> "One must be very careful when (while) one reads the Dictionary."
>>>
>>>Ain't that the truth!
>>>
>>>A couple of points:
>>>
>>>"Dictionary" is {mu'ghom}. A *{mu'Hom} - {mu'} "word" + {-Hom} "diminutive" - would be a "wordlet, minor word, etc." (A grammatical "particle" perhaps?)
>>>
>>
>> I took it to mean "fine print".
>>
>
> maj! choyajpu'!
>
> /buSwI'
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
