[86845] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Yet another newbie!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl-Filip Faxen)
Fri Nov 13 12:52:19 2009
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:50:20 +0100
From: Karl-Filip Faxen <kff@sics.se>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <1cb7130b0911130904n1db4f9f7uf8da6af81cabc969@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Tracy Canfield wrote:
> 2009/11/13 Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>:
>
>>>I do not think I got it right, I think it should be:
>>> {mu'Hom laDlu'taHviS yeplu'qu'niS}
>>
>> "One must be very careful when (while) one reads the Dictionary."
>>
>>Ain't that the truth!
>>
>>A couple of points:
>>
>>"Dictionary" is {mu'ghom}. A *{mu'Hom} - {mu'} "word" + {-Hom} "diminutive" - would be a "wordlet, minor word, etc." (A grammatical "particle" perhaps?)
>>
>
> I took it to mean "fine print".
>
maj! choyajpu'!
/buSwI'
>
>
>
