[86554] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com)
Fri Sep 18 14:51:15 2009
From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:49:17 EDT
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In a message dated 9/18/2009 13:49:15 Eastern Daylight Time,
qurgh@wizage.net writes:
> HoHbogh tlhIngan luja'chuq. HoHbogh tlhIngan vISov
> They discuses the Klingon that died. I know the Klingon that died.
>
> qurgh
>
Can {ja'chuq} take an object? I thought not, since {-chuq} implies the
object and subject are the same (each other, actually).
lay'tel SIvten
