[86553] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qurgh lungqIj)
Fri Sep 18 14:02:52 2009
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6EE94F1DAA2@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
From: qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:00:30 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> qurgh:
> >Thanks, that helps with that sentence. Do you have any information on the
> >double -bogh phrase I wrote?
>
> Well, I answered the easy one first. <g>
>
qatlho' :)
>
> >>Can you use a relative clause in another relative clause?
> >> HoHbogh tlhIngan (the Klingon that died)
>
> First, {HoHbogh tlhIngan} means "the Klingon that kills/killed". "The
> Klingon that died" would be {Heghpu'bogh tlhIngan}:
>
>
Ahh, HIvqa' veqlargh! I knew that! That's what I get for trying to multitask
at work too much :D
So to redo my own phrase:
Heghpu'bogh tlhIngan luja'chuq. tlhInganvetlh vISov
They discuses the Klingon that died. I knew that Klingon.
This works better?
qurgh
