[86333] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: News from Maltz
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qurgh lungqIj)
Tue Jul 28 10:22:16 2009
In-Reply-To: <20090728072351.147450@gmx.net>
From: qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:19:44 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Lieven Litaer <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
> > 2) The noun {vIl} is hard to define....
> > There is obviously an etymological relationship with and {vIlle'},
> > which is currently the best clue we have to its true meaning.
>
> I don't get it either. :-( Ain't there no more explanation?
>
It was also suggested that vIlHom could be a single ridge in a Quch.
qurgh
