[85487] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon Ad for my new novel!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (QeS 'utlh)
Tue May 19 12:24:39 2009
From: QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:22:37 +1000
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
ghItlhpu' ter'eS, ja':
>It's a natural-language feature, and not all that uncommon. I enjoy the ambiguity.
I don't have a problem with it so long as it doesn't prevent understanding. As I
said, {DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh} works very well stylistically. Even bigger
strings might be OK in the right place. All I'm saying is that *I* have had
issues with large strings in front of conjunctions, so in practice I tend to avoid
them. It's certainly not a law for me, just a tendency I've observed from my
experience writing Klingon.
>If you like certainty, learn Lojban!
Maybe, but I doubt Klingons would take kindly to overly ambiguous speech either. {{:)
QeS 'utlh
_________________________________________________________________
View photos of singles in your area Click Here
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fdating%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fsearch%2Fsearch%2Easpx%3Fexec%3Dgo%26tp%3Dq%26gc%3D2%26tr%3D1%26lage%3D18%26uage%3D55%26cl%3D14%26sl%3D0%26dist%3D50%26po%3D1%26do%3D2%26trackingid%3D1046138%26r2s%3D1&_t=773166090&_r=Hotmail_Endtext&_m=EXT
