[85267] in tlhIngan-Hol
RE: KLBG Translation assistance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (steve.weaver@att.net)
Mon Jan 26 11:13:20 2009
From: steve.weaver@att.net
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:05:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <C0B51AC5D9064111972E2BB67C76B337@juH.Seruqtuq.net>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
It's a fancy way of saying bombs instead of dynamite
-------------- Original message from "DloraH" <seruq@bellsouth.net>: --------------
> ... It is a job title, and "explosive ordnance" is a specific type of
> ordnance,
> Is there any reason one couldn't call them simply "explosives" instead of
> "explosive ordnance"? Are
> there explosives that are not ordnance?
>
> jorwI' - explosive
> luch - gear, equipment
>
> disposal - not sure what would work best in this context. I'm on my way to
> work. I'll poke around
> with some ideas there.
> Let's see what the other guys have.
>
>
> DloraH
>
>
>
