[85056] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: I don't work here!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Terrence Donnelly)
Thu Sep 11 20:18:08 2008

Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <48c9a651.1ebc720a.374b.71f5@mx.google.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

tlhIngan Hol Dalo'chugh, vaj bIjatlhDI' qanwI' mIS law', bIjatlhpa' qanwI' mIS puS!

-- ter'eS


--- On Thu, 9/11/08, nahqun@gmail.com <nahqun@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: nahqun@gmail.com <nahqun@gmail.com>
> Subject: I don't work here!
> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 6:14 PM
> So I spend my nights delivering medications to nursing
> homes. And more often than I'd like, old people start
> asking me questions-questions that I don't have answers
> to. And per company policy, I'm not really supposed to
> do much interacting with the residents.
> It is common for people to say "I don't work
> here" when mistaken for an employee, but I'm not
> quite sure how to say it in Klingon.
> 
> A simple dictionary lookup gives me 3 words for
> "work": baj, Qap, and vum.
> 
> baj-earn, work for (actively)
> 
> Qap-work, function, succeed, operate, be in operation
> 
> vum-work, toil
> 
> At first baj looks spot on:
> malja'vam vIbajbe' (I don't work for this
> business).
> But the full definition makes it clear that I'm to be
> working towards a goal.
> 
> As for the other two, I do indeed function, toil, and work
> *at* these places.
> 
> Am I missing an obvious workaround?
> 
> ~naHQun
> 
> --
> http://twitter.com/roneyii



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post