[84715] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: SoSwI' SoH'a'?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doq)
Tue May 20 16:41:35 2008
From: Doq <doq@embarqmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <f1d476f10805201331p3709aeaek5c471d389d81740c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:40:25 -0400
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
QImDuq vIghaj. chIS. QIm yor vIteqtaHvIS QIm 'uch QImDuq. QIm qoD
vISoptaHvIS QIm 'uch QImDuq. vISopta'DI', pel 'aQ 'uch QImDuq.
Doq
On May 20, 2008, at 4:31 PM, ghunchu'wI' 'utlh wrote:
> On 5/20/08, Doq <doq@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wow. A rare opportunity to suggest a correction to ghunchu'wI'.
>>
>> I suspect you meant QImDuq instead of QInDuQ.
>
> DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'. bIlughba'. I indeed intended to
> evoke "egg-bowl", not "stab-egg" (or even "stab-spearpoint, but that's
> another issue).
>
> But, again, I don't want anyone to come away from this with a new
> entry in
> their personal dictionary. I won't stop you from using it if you
> think it
> works in Klingon, but expect it not to be understood by everyone.
>
>
>
