[84487] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com)
Wed Apr 23 01:01:53 2008
From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:00:09 EDT
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In a message dated 4/22/2008 23:08:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
Sangqar@hotmail.com writes:
> On a more serious note, I'm a little confused as to what context renders
> my example irrelevant. It can't be the fact that we're discussing
> compound nouns, since Okrand clearly used English compound nouns to
> demonstrate the Klingon principle. And it can't be the fact that we're
> discussing pronunciation, as the majority of examples Okrand uses to
> demonstrate Klingon pronunciation are English.
>
> I'm willing to consider that my example might be irrelevant, but so far
> I'm not convinced.
>
Using English as an example is fine, as long as it's noted as such.
I didn't see any such indication in the original post.
lay'tel SIvten </HTML>
