[652] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: ghopHol
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Apr 22 14:26:23 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 93 12:35:57 -0400
Normally, as you probably know, I'm wary of constructing 'descriptive' words fo
r
missing vocabulary, because the logic used to construct it can seldom be easily
recreated by the reader unfamiliar with it. However, I think ghopHol is one of
the rather rare cases where it works. I had no problem understanding what it
meant, did not require a translation or explanation. So my input would be that
it's fine.
--Krankor
