[639] in tlhIngan-Hol
"-ghach" as gerund-forming particle?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Apr 22 01:06:50 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: erich@bush.cs.tamu.edu (Erich Schneider)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 93 22:32:51 CDT
Msg origin: SFC/GALEXCOM/USS Intrepid/NCC1708
Msg sender: LCDR Erich R. Schneider/Head, COMSCI
I may not have caught all the debate about "-ghach" and noun to verb
constructions, but would it be dangerous to assume that "-ghach" is
a general gerund-forming particle? (Like verbs with "-ing" in English
used as nouns.)
Erich Schneider erich@bush.cs.tamu.edu
"The Hierophant is Disguised and Confused."
