[3628] in tlhIngan-Hol
Noun-Noun stuff
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Mon Mar 7 11:43:40 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 11:36:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: dls9@aol.com's message of Sat, 05 Mar 94 16:11:49 EST <9403051611.
tn268993@aol.com>
>From: dls9@aol.com
>Date: Sat, 05 Mar 94 16:11:49 EST
>I was just now listening to CK, specifically to find canonical examples of
>some of the words recently under controversy.
>I found the sentence {pegh De'vetlh} meaning "That is classified
>information." This would suggest that {pegh} has an alternate meaning, "be
>secret."
Great, that confirms what I thought about "De'pegh vIghaj" in PK. Cool.
>Also, the construction {ghorgh pa'wIjDaq jIchegh}. This may seem trivial, but
>it was something over which ~mark and I had a small argument, as to whether
>{chegh} is transitive or intransitive, and whether one should say
>{jIchegh'eghta'} for "I have returned." Well, the canon tells us we shouldn't
>have to, that {jIcheghta'} will suffice.
Great!!! Thanks; I'd been using "chegh'egh" and wondering if it was right.
Glad you found that example.
>Guido#1, Leader of All Guidos
~mark
