[2980] in tlhIngan-Hol
Rovers and more...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Feb 4 15:28:50 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 11:26:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: Mark E. Shoulson's message of Fri, 4 Feb 1994 11:07:54 -0500 <1994
02041607.LAA19983@startide.ctr.columbia.edu>
>From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
>Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 11:07:54 -0500
>If the latter position is true, then you could say things like "nIleghwI'"
>for "that/those which that see us" (nominalizing "nIlegh", he/she/it/they
>see(s) us). This has not yet been attested in canon, but it's seen
>occasional use on this list.
Um, "nIleghwI'" would be "that/those which see *you*", not "us". Sorry.
reH latlh qabDaq qul tuj law' Hoch tuj puS. (another replacement proverb;
if it doesn't make sense to you, buy _Power Klingon_).
~mark
