[249] in tlhIngan-Hol
Transitivity, <-law'>
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Mar 26 12:37:28 1992
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: Allan C. Wechsler <ACW@YUKON.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1992 11:58-0500
In-Reply-To: <9203261030.AA06061@ima.ima.isc.com>
I'd like to get people's judgements on the following sentences. Are
they grammatical? What, in your opinion, do they mean?
(1) tIn qoq
(2) yaS tIn qoq
(3) yaSvaD tIn qoq
(4) tInlaw' qoq
(5) yaS tInlaw' qoq
(6) yaSvaD tInlaw' qoq
This is, as you might guess, part of my continuing attempt to
communicate my misgivings about <mungeDlaw'> "?It seems this is easy for
me."
