[1425] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

relative clauses?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Mon Aug 23 00:01:18 1993

Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: j.guy@trl.oz.au (Jacques Guy)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1993 10:33:53 +1000 (EST)



My mailbox suddenly bursts at the seams with belated Klingon list
mail, but nothing to do with my question on relative clauses, so
here again (starting from scratch, I was silly enough not to
save it).

Take these examples of main and relative clauses from the Klingon
Dictionary, p.64:

qIppu'bogh yaS vIlegh    I see the officer who hit him/her
yaS qIppu'bogh vIlegh    I see the officer whom he hit

How shall I say "I see the child who hit the officer"?

To quote: "The whole construction (relative clause plus head noun),
as a unit, is use in a sentence as a noun".

So:       qIppu' yaS       the officer hit him
  +bogh:  qIppu'bogh yas   *the officer who* hit him

          yaS qIppu'       he hit the officer
  +bogh:  yaS qIppu'bogh   *the officer whom* he hit

Now:
          yaS qIppu' puq       the child hit the officer
  +bogh   yaS qIppu'bogh puq   ? the child who hit the officer
                               ? the officer whom the child hit

My knee-jerk reaction is to say (in Klingon): "the child hit the
officer, I see the/that child", i.e.:

yaS qIppu' puq, puq<*> vIlegh

But,

1. I am not clear at all about what to use for the/that (my <*>):
   zero, -vam, -vetlh, something else?
2. I have a gut feeling that the two clauses are crying out for a
   coordinating conjunction, but I see no trace of such a conjunction
   in the grammar part of the Klingon Dictionary
3. Those two clauses, lacking a coordinating conjuction, feels a two
   independent clauses, so that

   yaS qIppu' puq, puq<*> vIlegh
   puq vIlegh, yaS qIppu' puq<*>

   feel equally permissible to me. I still feel a difference in meaning:
   in the second one, "yaS qIppu' pug<*>" feels like... and afterthought.

I will stop there, because further discussion would continue leading
into a maze of ungrounded hypotheses.

Only one more course of food for thought: how does one say "the torpedo
with which we destroyed the spaceship"?  I boils down to the same
problem, doesn't it?




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post