[112274] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] when -laH cripples the -lu'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Mar 19 06:02:41 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cK6ZTTV+YaFC+7ofnEiKU+9GFp4_JP6pCrwMOANLk-ZRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:02:26 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============0002969194946620651==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d07ba405846f9ad6"
--000000000000d07ba405846f9ad6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 10:48, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> De'vID:
> > But why wouldn't you be doing this to begin with,
> > *regardless* of whether {-lu'}/{-laH} were the same suffix type or not?
> > So let's pretend that {-lu'laH} is permissible. What is the passage you
> would've written?
>
> If I was to write a long passage with regards to lets say,
> enviromental pollution, and whether someone as an individual could
> contribute to protecting the enviroment, my first choice would be to
> use -lu', because I would need to talk about someone unspecified.
>
> Of course, vay' could word as well; but my first choice would be -lu',
> provided of course I wouldn't need to switch to vay', as soon as I
> would need to write "someone is able/unable".
>
Write the passage. I want to see how often you actually produce something
that requires {-lu'laH}.
--
De'vID
--000000000000d07ba405846f9ad6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 10:48, mayqel =
qunen'oS <<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>=
> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px =
0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">De&#=
39;vID:<br>
> But why wouldn't you be doing this to begin with,<br>
> *regardless* of whether {-lu'}/{-laH} were the same suffix type or=
not?<br>
> So let's pretend that {-lu'laH} is permissible. What is the pa=
ssage you would've written?<br>
<br>
If I was to write a long passage with regards to lets say,<br>
enviromental pollution, and whether someone as an individual could<br>
contribute to protecting the enviroment, my first choice would be to<br>
use -lu', because I would need to talk about someone unspecified.<br>
<br>
Of course, vay' could word as well; but my first choice would be -lu=
9;,<br>
provided of course I wouldn't need to switch to vay', as soon as I<=
br>
would need to write "someone is able/unable".<br></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>Write the passage. I want to see how often you actually pr=
oduce something that requires {-lu'laH}.</div></div><div><br></div>-- <=
br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De'vID</div></div>
--000000000000d07ba405846f9ad6--
--===============0002969194946620651==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0002969194946620651==--
