[112273] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] when -laH cripples the -lu'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunen'oS)
Tue Mar 19 05:48:38 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmN_kcgipjXrALunivo7t3ccOmxz5-waEJ-Edi6rL+wuQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "mayqel qunen'oS" <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:48:24 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
De'vID:
> But why wouldn't you be doing this to begin with,
> *regardless* of whether {-lu'}/{-laH} were the same suffix type or not?
> So let's pretend that {-lu'laH} is permissible. What is the passage you would've written?
If I was to write a long passage with regards to lets say,
enviromental pollution, and whether someone as an individual could
contribute to protecting the enviroment, my first choice would be to
use -lu', because I would need to talk about someone unspecified.
Of course, vay' could word as well; but my first choice would be -lu',
provided of course I wouldn't need to switch to vay', as soon as I
would need to write "someone is able/unable".
~ changan qij
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
