[112268] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] when -laH cripples the -lu'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Mon Mar 18 17:44:55 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+7wFguLxmvrQcNveC6Ph4SvNc77-kwmKykhFNpyD01kQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:44:39 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============0168845963495487183==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e7f0d0584654c92"
--0000000000005e7f0d0584654c92
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 20:37, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Suppose you wanted to write, a long passage with regards to the process of
> learning a foreign language. Starting from how often one should study, how
> one should study, the things one should avoid, etc..
>
> How would you approach it, without using the -lu' ?
>
> The only choices I can think of, are saying {vay'} and/or {ghojwI'}, and
> using them interchangeably. But I would avoid the - lu', if not for any
> other reason, at least in order to avoid hitting the simultaneous -laH/lu'
> obstacle.
>
> Would you approach this differently ?
>
Why wouldn't you just use {vay'}, and then subsequently use {ghaH} to refer
back to that person? The first mention of your hypothetical person might be
indefinite, but subsequent mentions aren't indefinite any more: they are
about the same someone you've already mentioned.
--
De'vID
--0000000000005e7f0d0584654c92
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 20:37, mayqel =
qunen'oS <<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>=
> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px =
0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div=
dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px;font-family=
:sans-serif">Suppose you wanted to write, a long passage with regards to th=
e process of learning a foreign language. Starting from how often one shoul=
d study, how one should study, the things one should avoid, etc..</span><br=
></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size=
:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif=
"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">How would you approach it, without using=
the -lu' ?</span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-ser=
if"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">The only cho=
ices I can think of, are saying {vay'} and/or {ghojwI'}, and using =
them interchangeably. But I would avoid the - lu', if not for any other=
reason, at least in order to avoid hitting the simultaneous -laH/lu' o=
bstacle.</span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><sp=
an style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><fo=
nt face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">Would you approach =
this differently ?</span></font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><di=
v>Why wouldn't you just use {vay'}, and then subsequently use {ghaH=
} to refer back to that person? The first mention of your hypothetical pers=
on might be indefinite, but subsequent mentions aren't indefinite any m=
ore: they are about the same someone you've already mentioned.</div><di=
v>=C2=A0</div></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De=
9;vID</div></div>
--0000000000005e7f0d0584654c92--
--===============0168845963495487183==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0168845963495487183==--
