[112116] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Does rIntaH require a sentient being ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Fri Mar 8 16:06:05 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:06:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E913BF4E-EA7B-42C6-889B-1B3C1CFB9DD0@mac.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============7561951517067770219==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------894BDCA93E9E0BF06ECBE41A"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------894BDCA93E9E0BF06ECBE41A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 3/8/2019 3:17 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> {rIntaH} also can follow a sentence to indicate that something is
> completely done.
>
> Both of these instances involve the verb {rIn} without its own
> subject, object, or prefix indicating subject or object.
TKD says that *rIntaH* follows the verb. No examples of verbs with
explicit subjects have occurred, so a strict reading of the text says
that *vIje' rIntaH jIH* is more correct than *vIje' jIH rIntaH.* I would
not be surprised if that weren't an absolute — but again, we have no data.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------894BDCA93E9E0BF06ECBE41A
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/8/2019 3:17 PM, Will Martin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:E913BF4E-EA7B-42C6-889B-1B3C1CFB9DD0@mac.com">
<div class="">{rIntaH} also can follow a sentence to indicate that
something is completely done.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Both of these instances involve the verb {rIn}
without its own subject, object, or prefix indicating subject or
object.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>TKD says that <b>rIntaH</b> follows the verb. No examples of
verbs with explicit subjects have occurred, so a strict reading of
the text says that <b>vIje' rIntaH jIH</b> is more correct than <b>vIje'
jIH rIntaH.</b> I would not be surprised if that weren't an
absolute — but again, we have no data.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------894BDCA93E9E0BF06ECBE41A--
--===============7561951517067770219==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============7561951517067770219==--
