[112061] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] chevchuqmoH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Dadap)
Tue Mar 5 10:42:54 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: Daniel Dadap <daniel@dadap.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:42:41 -0600
In-Reply-To: <0bc57bb1-51ae-58bf-0405-f398c3c37806@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@scanner01.mail.supportedns.com
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============5418856341818044562==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-F8E86D53-6A1A-49A0-9416-D87152BAFF5C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--Apple-Mail-F8E86D53-6A1A-49A0-9416-D87152BAFF5C
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mar 5, 2019, at 09:14, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>> I think it could be meaningful in the same way {Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH q=
eylIS} is. {qeylIS} is the singular subject of {muvchuqmoH}; the {tuqmey} ar=
e the plural object of {muvchuqmoH} which makes them into the plural subject=
of {muvchuq}.
> Here we go again. In mayqel's proposed sentence, tlhInganpu' and romuluSng=
anpu' are not the subjects of anything. qeylIS is the only subject anywhere.=
tlhInganpu' and romuluSnganpu' might be considered as entities that perform=
chevchuq, but the verb isn't chevchuq, it's chevchuqmoH.
>=20
But how is this different from the {muvchuqmoH} example I cited above? {qeyl=
IS} is the only subject in that sentence as well, and clearly he can=E2=80=99=
t {-chuq} all on his own in that sentence, either.=
--Apple-Mail-F8E86D53-6A1A-49A0-9416-D87152BAFF5C
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr"></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br=
></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br>On Mar 5, 2019, at 09:14, SuStel <<a href=3D"=
mailto:sustel@trimboli.name">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:<br><br></di=
v><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr"><blockquote type=3D"cite" cite=3D=
"mid:2A1BFBD1-C4AF-4669-BC28-94ED97BC2627@dadap.net"><div>I think it
could be meaningful in the same way {<span style=3D"background-color=
: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Qo'noS
tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS} is. {qeylIS} is the singular subject
of {muvchuqmoH}; the {tuq</span><span style=3D"background-color:
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">mey} are the plural object of
{muvchuqmoH} which makes them into the plural subject of
{muvchuq}.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Here we go again. In mayqel's proposed sentence, <b>tlhInganpu'
</b>and <b>romuluSnganpu'</b> are not the subjects of anything. <b>qey=
lIS</b>
is the only subject anywhere. <b>tlhInganpu'</b> and <b>romuluSnganpu'=
</b>
might be considered as entities that perform <b>chevchuq,</b> but
the verb isn't <b>chevchuq,</b> it's <b>chevchuqmoH.</b></p></div></bl=
ockquote><br><div>But how is this different from the {muvchuqmoH} example I c=
ited above? {qeylIS} is the only subject in that sentence as well, and clear=
ly he can=E2=80=99t {-chuq} all on his own in that sentence, either.</div></=
body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-F8E86D53-6A1A-49A0-9416-D87152BAFF5C--
--===============5418856341818044562==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============5418856341818044562==--
