[111809] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[tlhIngan Hol] Why not law'wI'pu' ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Thu Feb 21 12:45:13 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:38:05 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

jot = be calm
jotwI' = someone who is calm

Qup = young
QupwI' = someone who is young

law' = be numerous, be many
law'wI'pu' = those who are many

So, we could say:
Har law'wI'pu'
many believe

*Something* tells me that it can't be correct
But that *something* can't figure out the why

~ gho'at
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post