[111735] in tlhIngan-Hol
[tlhIngan Hol] Source of {magh} v. "indicate, reveal"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Mon Oct 30 04:30:50 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPy=VQtw2Gu8tKn749SFuzOgbWTBMv1J2T9sZ2E1pC9SA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:33:08 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1869973205426064884==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a9c6616a553055c79eb21"
--001a114a9c6616a553055c79eb21
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> magh indicate, reveal (v)
>
What do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify
this definition.
Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a trap,
since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes claim it's a
possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator. However, the
text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'm aware of where
new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.
What is the origin of this definition?
--
De'vID
--001a114a9c6616a553055c79eb21
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote">On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <<a href=
=3D"mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.c=
om</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"m_7052611051=
014917389m_706021497983657752quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_e=
xtra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven =
Boozer <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:sboozer@uchicago.edu" target=
=3D"_blank">sboozer@uchicago.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">magh=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 indicate,=C2=A0=
reveal (v)<br></blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div>What=
do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify this d=
efinition.</div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto">Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (o=
r perhaps a trap, since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray")=
. My notes claim it's a possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Co=
mmunicator. However, the text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only i=
ssue I'm aware of where new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this=
listed.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">What is the ori=
gin of this definition?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">=
--=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">De'vID</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" =
dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"m_705261105101=
4917389m_706021497983657752quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
--001a114a9c6616a553055c79eb21--
--===============1869973205426064884==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1869973205426064884==--
