[111717] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Source of {magh} v. "indicate, reveal"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Sat Oct 28 21:15:47 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOe_GkTw_m6FX_Rqij2F5h6+J925NR60oeNL9bSd8p0pQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:46:12 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============3109966288214589469==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0828702cdc45e8055c7a19df"
--089e0828702cdc45e8055c7a19df
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Oct 26, 2017 23:33, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> magh indicate, reveal (v)
>
What do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify
this definition.
Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a trap,
since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes claim it's a
possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator. However, the
text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'm aware of where
new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.
What is the origin of this definition?
Curiously, the KLI new words list have {magh} listed as "betray", but with
the origin given as "MSN and HolQeD v5n3p15 - S26".
https://www.kli.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/m/
Indeed, the word is *used* in SkyBox card 26, the content of which is
printed in HolQeD 5:3. But I checked TKD and this isn't a new word. It's in
TKD (and not the Addendum).
Did someone deliberately introduce an error in the KLI new words list
(using the word {magh} "betray") to catch copiers? If so, naughty naughty.
--
De'vID
--089e0828702cdc45e8055c7a19df
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gma=
il_quote">On Oct 26, 2017 23:33, "De'vID" <<a href=3D"mail=
to:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=
=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto"><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Oct 1, 2017=
00:50, "De'vID" <<a href=3D"mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.co=
m" target=3D"_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attr=
ibution"><blockquote class=3D"m_-2925120499961369358m_7052611051014917389m_=
706021497983657752quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc so=
lid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><=
div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:sboozer@uchicago.edu" target=3D"_blank"=
>sboozer@uchicago.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1e=
x">magh=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 indicate,=C2=A0 reveal (v)=
<br></blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div>What do you hav=
e as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify this definition.<=
/div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D=
"auto">Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a=
trap, since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes =
claim it's a possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator.=
However, the text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'=
m aware of where new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.</d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">What is the origin of this=
definition?</div><font color=3D"#888888"><div dir=3D"auto"></div></font></=
div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"=
auto">Curiously, the KLI new words list have {magh} listed as "betray&=
quot;, but with the origin given as "MSN and=C2=A0HolQeD=C2=A0v5n3p15 =
- S26".=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><a hr=
ef=3D"https://www.kli.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/m/">https://www.k=
li.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/m/</a></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Indeed, the wo=
rd is *used* in SkyBox card 26, the content of which is printed in HolQeD 5=
:3. But I</span>=C2=A0checked TKD and this isn't a new word. It's i=
n TKD (and not the Addendum).</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"=
auto">Did someone deliberately introduce an error in the KLI new words list=
(using the word {magh} "betray") to catch copiers? If so, naught=
y naughty.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">--=C2=A0</div=
><div dir=3D"auto">De'vID</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div>
--089e0828702cdc45e8055c7a19df--
--===============3109966288214589469==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============3109966288214589469==--
