[111664] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] verbs with {-bogh} and numbers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Fri Oct 20 03:55:45 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPnoPLEtjQgQhM4Q8m3dv657Se5Y42x-Vpz8g58xD+2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:19:49 +0300
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
De'vID:
> That's clearly a situation which isn't yet a problem.
This means that the {wej qay'bogh ghu'} is correct/acceptable too ?
~nIghma'
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:04 PM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 October 2017 at 16:55, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Lets say I write:
>>
>> {qay'bogh ghu'}
>> a situation which is a problem
>>
>> I can also write:
>> {qay'bogh cha' ghu'}
>> two situations which are problem
>>
>> But can I also write:
>> {wej qay'bogh ghu'}
>> three situations which are problem ?
>>
>
> That's clearly a situation which isn't yet a problem.
>
> --
> De'vID
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
