[111617] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Klingon Word of the Day: 'Imyagh

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Sat Oct 14 08:06:40 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: ghunchu'wI' 'utlh <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:58:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ddd482f1-2d67-ead8-68d8-3b63243d09b9@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org


--===============6822829993529415767==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-8D79DFAD-B986-4C69-A02E-D00B8A4DE11D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Apple-Mail-8D79DFAD-B986-4C69-A02E-D00B8A4DE11D
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 13, 2017, at 4:23 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>=20
>> On 10/13/2017 2:55 PM, ghunchu'wI' 'utlh wrote:
>>> On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:26 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>>> I wouldn=E2=80=99t make that assumption. If you must quote a cat, say: g=
hugh vIghro=E2=80=99; jatlh =E2=80=98Imyagh.
>>=20
>> I think that contradicts the =E2=80=9Cnot speech=E2=80=9D part of {ghugh}=
=E2=80=99s definition. It makes perfect sense in my mind to treat {ghugh} as=
 similar to {jatlh}.
> If it's not speech, then it's not a verb of saying.
>=20
What is your definition of =E2=80=9Cverb of saying=E2=80=9D, and who called {=
ghugh} one?

-- ghunchu'wI'=

--Apple-Mail-8D79DFAD-B986-4C69-A02E-D00B8A4DE11D
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>On Oct 13, 2017, at 4:23 PM, SuStel &l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:sustel@trimboli.name">sustel@trimboli.name</a>&gt; wrote=
:</div><div><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>
 =20
    <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"=
>
 =20
 =20
    <div class=3D"moz-cite-prefix">On 10/13/2017 2:55 PM, ghunchu'wI'
      'utlh wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite" cite=3D"mid:8BF87BC6-C4C3-4438-B264-C6831CFD9A=
95@alcaco.net">
      <div>On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:26 PM, SuStel &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sustel=
@trimboli.name" moz-do-not-send=3D"true">sustel@trimboli.name</a>&gt;
        wrote:</div>
      <blockquote type=3D"cite">
        <div>I wouldn=E2=80=99t make that assumption. If you must quote a ca=
t,
          say:<b> ghugh vIghro=E2=80=99; jatlh =E2=80=98Imyagh</b>.</div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <div><span style=3D"background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I
          think that contradicts the =E2=80=9Cnot speech=E2=80=9D part of {g=
hugh}=E2=80=99s
          definition. It makes perfect sense in my mind to
          treat&nbsp;{ghugh}&nbsp;as similar to {jatlh}.</span></div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>If it's not speech, then it's not a verb of saying.</p></div></blockq=
uote><div>What is your definition of =E2=80=9Cverb of saying=E2=80=9D, and w=
ho called {ghugh} one?</div><div><span style=3D"background-color: rgba(255, 2=
55, 255, 0);"><br></span><div><span style=3D"background-color: rgba(255, 255=
, 255, 0);">-- ghunchu'wI'</span></div></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-8D79DFAD-B986-4C69-A02E-D00B8A4DE11D--

--===============6822829993529415767==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============6822829993529415767==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post