[111522] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] [Tlhingan-hol] qep'a' wish list 2015
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Roney, Jr.)
Tue Oct 10 06:51:10 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKXmuDJPHA1-yXAjxV6yT=0SzLcVFhAZZ=VzKYTbdKDqRrxTWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Michael Roney, Jr." <nahqun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:35:31 -0400
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1462986420544937380==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06e86e20a69d055b1c6d8f"
--94eb2c06e86e20a69d055b1c6d8f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Tad Stauffer <tadbot@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. <nahqun@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> ***DSC Spoiler ahead***
>
>
> jughuHmoHmeH mu'meyvetlh'e' Dalo'DI', bejbe'qu'wI''e' DaghuHmoH 'e' vIHar
rIntaH.
> DaHjaj batlh vebbogh 'ay' wIbej jIH be'nalwI' je.
Okay, so far I'm following everything except {batlh}.
What was it about the way that y'all watched the episode that made it
"honorable"?
> tuch 'ay' Da'otHa'ta', ngugh 'e' vItlhoj.
You seem to be implying that I gave a spoiler for an unaired episode.
My spoiler warning was for episode 3, "Context is for Kings" which aired in
the US on October 1st.
My e-mail was sent on October 7th, giving, IMO, plenty of time for global
viewers to catch the episode.
> vaj SoHvaD qeS vIchup:
> ***DSC Spoiler ahead for the episode that will air on [future date]***
yIlo'.
If I were to somehow possess knowledge of a future episode, and felt the
need to post it here, I would indeed use such a warning.
But I believe that we agreed on waiting at least 2 days after the episode
air date, and posting upcoming spoilers would go against that agreement.
--
~Michael Roney, Jr.
Freelance Translator
--94eb2c06e86e20a69d055b1c6d8f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br>On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Tad Stauffer <=
<a href=3D"mailto:tadbot@gmail.com">tadbot@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>=
<br>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. <<a href=3D"=
mailto:nahqun@gmail.com">nahqun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>=
;> ***DSC Spoiler ahead***<br>><br>><br>> jughuHmoHmeH mu'm=
eyvetlh'e' Dalo'DI', bejbe'qu'wI''e' Da=
ghuHmoH 'e' vIHar rIntaH.<br>> DaHjaj batlh vebbogh 'ay'=
wIbej jIH be'nalwI' je.<div><br></div><div>Okay, so far I'm fo=
llowing everything except {batlh}.</div><div>What was it about the way that=
y'all watched the episode that made it "honorable"?</div><di=
v><br>> tuch 'ay' Da'otHa'ta', ngugh 'e' vIt=
lhoj.</div><div><br></div><div>You seem to be implying that I gave a spoile=
r for an unaired episode.</div><div>My spoiler warning was for episode 3, &=
quot;Context is for Kings" which aired in the US on October 1st.</div>=
<div>My e-mail was sent on October 7th, giving, IMO, plenty of time for glo=
bal viewers to catch the episode.</div><div><br>> vaj SoHvaD qeS vIchup:=
<br>> =C2=A0***DSC Spoiler ahead for the episode that will air on [futur=
e date]*** yIlo'.<br><br><br>If I were to somehow possess knowledge of =
a future episode, and felt the need to post it here, I would indeed use suc=
h a warning.</div><div>But I believe that we agreed on waiting at least 2 d=
ays after the episode air date, and posting upcoming spoilers would go agai=
nst that agreement.=C2=A0=C2=A0<br><br>--<br>~Michael Roney, Jr.<br>Freelan=
ce Translator</div></div>
--94eb2c06e86e20a69d055b1c6d8f--
--===============1462986420544937380==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1462986420544937380==--
