[111429] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] male female baby
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Fri Oct 6 04:16:11 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:46:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <381958f4-9bcd-9d3a-78e9-5519a5f3179a@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
>> To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases:
>> {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.}
Am 03.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb SuStel:
> That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu
> vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*
You are definitely right, that's more accurate. I had the same thing in
mind as well. But then I thought like, hey, I already said it's a BABY.
No need to mention the {Hom}-part any more.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany"
http://www.klingonisch.net
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/StarTrekDiscovery
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
