[111283] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Klingon Word of the Day: vung
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Sat Sep 30 04:25:58 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <bd7131fe-acee-9392-770a-4a4b20ce89bd@trimboli.name>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:19:06 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============7215145642772761280==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c111d0686805d055a5ded1e"
--94eb2c111d0686805d055a5ded1e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:35 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>
> Good find with the sonnet, though there's the caveat that Okrand wrote one
> half and an unidentified Klingonist wrote the other half, and the half
> without the *jev* seems more likely to be Okrand's work. We don't know
> how closely Okrand may have looked at it. I'll consider this a questionable
> data point in favor of *jevwI'.*
>
I thought the situation with the sonnet was that there were two pieces
translated for a wedding (a few lines from King John and Sonnet 116),
Okrand did one of the pieces, the Unknown Klingonist did the other, and
it's generally believed that Okrand did the sonnet. Is that not the case?
--94eb2c111d0686805d055a5ded1e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:35 PM, SuStel <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto=
:sustel@trimboli.name" target=3D"_blank">sustel@trimboli.name</a>></span=
> wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FF=
FFFF"><p></p></div></blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text=3D=
"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
<p>Good find with the sonnet, though there's the caveat that Okrand
wrote one half and an unidentified Klingonist wrote the other
half, and the half without the <b>jev</b> seems more likely to be
Okrand's work. We don't know how closely Okrand may have look=
ed at
it. I'll consider this a questionable data point in favor of <b>j=
evwI'.</b><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br></font></s=
pan></p></div></blockquote><div>I thought the situation with the sonnet was=
that there were two pieces translated for a wedding (a few lines from King=
John and Sonnet 116), Okrand did one of the pieces, the Unknown Klingonist=
did the other, and it's generally believed that Okrand did the sonnet.=
Is that not the case?<br></div></div><br></div></div>
--94eb2c111d0686805d055a5ded1e--
--===============7215145642772761280==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============7215145642772761280==--
