[110891] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] vengDaq, vengmeyDaq je
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Wed Sep 6 04:49:44 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmMqZLzWT5F9wbEY7PkCpPvjXtrzi3o5R95u+J5PcQWMbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:49:41 +0300
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============5490697289379835368==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b3b54bbeabf0558816cbc"
--94eb2c1b3b54bbeabf0558816cbc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
The problem with {ngIq} is that its use hasn't been completely clarified.
If I was to translate the original sentence, then perhaps I would write:
Daw'choH wa' veng; ngugh Daw'choH je Hoch latlh veng.
One city begun to revolt; then each additional city begun to revolt too.
or
Daw'choH wa' veng; ngugh wa'DIch Da Hoch latlh veng.
One city begun to revolt; then each additional city behaved as the first.
or
Daw'choH wa' veng; ngugh veng wa'DIch Da Hoch latlh veng.
One city begun to revolt; then each additional city behaved as the first
city.
or
Daw'choH wa' veng; ngugh Daw'choH je wa' latlh veng. 'ej ngugh latlh veng,
'ej ngugh latlh.. tagha' Daw' Hoch vengmey.
One city begun to revolt; then one other city revolted too. And then
another city, and then another.. Finally all cities revolted.
Of the above, my favourite way to describe the original intented sentence,
is the last.
qunnoq
On Sep 6, 2017 08:53, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2017 10:19, "Anthony Appleyard" <a.appleyard@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> An expression meaning "in succession" seems to be needed.
>
>
> qatlh yapbe' {ngIq}?
>
> --
> De'vID
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
--94eb2c1b3b54bbeabf0558816cbc
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div style=3D"font-family:sans-serif" dir=3D"auto">The pr=
oblem with {ngIq} is that its use hasn't been completely clarified.</di=
v><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"=
auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">If I was to translate the original s=
entence, then perhaps I would write:</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-f=
amily:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-ser=
if">Daw'choH wa' veng; ngugh Daw'choH je Hoch latlh veng.</div>=
<div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">One city begun to revolt=
; then each additional city begun to revolt too.</div><div dir=3D"auto" sty=
le=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-fam=
ily:sans-serif">or</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">=
<br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Daw'choH w=
a' veng; ngugh wa'DIch Da Hoch latlh veng.<br></div><div dir=3D"aut=
o" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">One city begun to revolt; then each add=
itional city behaved as the first.</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-fam=
ily:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif=
">or</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div=
dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><div dir=3D"auto">Daw'ch=
oH wa' veng; ngugh veng wa'DIch Da Hoch latlh veng.<br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto">One city begun to revolt; then each additional city behaved as =
the first city.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">or</div>=
<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Daw'choH wa' veng; ng=
ugh Daw'choH je wa' latlh veng. 'ej ngugh latlh veng, 'ej n=
gugh latlh.. tagha' Daw' Hoch vengmey.</div><div dir=3D"auto">One c=
ity begun to revolt; then one other city revolted too. And then another cit=
y, and then another.. Finally all cities revolted.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><=
br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Of the above, my favourite way to describe the o=
riginal intented sentence, is the last.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto">qunnoq</div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div=
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sep 6, 2017 08:53, "De'vID" <<a =
href=3D"mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>> wro=
te:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto=
"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Sep 6, 2017 10:19, "Anthony Appleyard" <<a href=3D"mailto=
:a.appleyard@btinternet.com" target=3D"_blank">a.appleyard@btinternet.com</=
a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"m_-2835992496131=
304249quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-=
left:1ex">An expression meaning "in succession" seems to be neede=
d.</blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">qa=
tlh yapbe' {ngIq}?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">-=
-=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">De'vID</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" d=
ir=3D"auto"></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
--94eb2c1b3b54bbeabf0558816cbc--
--===============5490697289379835368==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============5490697289379835368==--
