[110761] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] The {-chuqmoH}

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Tue Aug 29 11:36:07 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:16:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLKMDVg9HZJRLfdPx_Yn4aoiss3yVz84HWi8qa4aHX2EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============3769673097056208111==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------B512816C276AD2EDA2341442"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------B512816C276AD2EDA2341442
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 8/29/2017 10:45 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> However, lets return to the {-chuqmoH}. We have the canon sentence
> {Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS}.
>
> As you wrote: "There are two ways to interpret muvchuqmoH:
> [muvchuq]moH he (singular subject) causes them (plural object) to join
> each other and [muv]chuq[moH] they (plural, reflexive subject) cause
> each other to join."
>
> So, if I understand correctly what has been explained so far, then the
> following two sentences are correct:
>
> {verengan Duj vIHIvchuqmoH jIH}
> I caused the ferengi ships to attack each other
>
> {HIvchuqmoH verengan Duj}
> the ferengi ships caused each other to attack each other

That last one is /the Ferengi ships cause each other to attack/ or /the 
Ferengi ship causes someone unspecified to attack each other./ In 
neither case does the subject attack itself.


> But if I wrote:
>
> {verengan Duj luHIvchuqmoH cha' Duj nov}
> two alien ships caused each other to attack the ferengi ship
>
> {verengan Duj DIHIvchuqmoH maH tlhIH je}
> We and you caused each other to attack the ferengi ships
>
> Then both of these sentences are wrong.
>
> Is my understanding correct ?

Yes. Unless Klingon allows reflexive verbs to also take objects, which 
there is, I think, slight evidence of. For example, the thinking goes 
that you can't say *tuqlIj qun wIja'chuq.*

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------B512816C276AD2EDA2341442
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/29/2017 10:45 AM, mayqel qunenoS
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLKMDVg9HZJRLfdPx_Yn4aoiss3yVz84HWi8qa4aHX2EQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <pre wrap="">However, lets return to the {-chuqmoH}. We have the canon sentence
{Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS}.

As you wrote: "There are two ways to interpret muvchuqmoH:
[muvchuq]moH he (singular subject) causes them (plural object) to join
each other and [muv]chuq[moH] they (plural, reflexive subject) cause
each other to join."

So, if I understand correctly what has been explained so far, then the
following two sentences are correct:

{verengan Duj vIHIvchuqmoH jIH}
I caused the ferengi ships to attack each other

{HIvchuqmoH verengan Duj}
the ferengi ships caused each other to attack each other</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <p>That last one is <i>the Ferengi ships cause each other to attack</i>
      or <i>the Ferengi ship causes someone unspecified to attack each
        other.</i> In neither case does the subject attack itself.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLKMDVg9HZJRLfdPx_Yn4aoiss3yVz84HWi8qa4aHX2EQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <pre wrap="">But if I wrote:

{verengan Duj luHIvchuqmoH cha' Duj nov}
two alien ships caused each other to attack the ferengi ship

{verengan Duj DIHIvchuqmoH maH tlhIH je}
We and you caused each other to attack the ferengi ships

Then both of these sentences are wrong.

Is my understanding correct ?</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yes. Unless Klingon allows reflexive verbs to also take objects,
      which there is, I think, slight evidence of. For example, the
      thinking goes that you can't say <b>tuqlIj qun wIja'chuq.</b></p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------B512816C276AD2EDA2341442--

--===============3769673097056208111==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============3769673097056208111==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post