[110557] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] When did you buy the phone which you now use ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Fri Aug 11 10:09:22 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLanre447qCJpGqECmZ++WitkSUA4eUEeVMovFUw9nDmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:09:18 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1783753964350869493==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05a384ee6f0205567adba2"
--94eb2c05a384ee6f0205567adba2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> All of these are indeed wonderful suggestions, but let me ask you
> something.
>
> Is the original sentence {ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo'bogh Daje' ?} grammatically
> correct ?
>
> Can we have side by side {ghorgh} and {DaH} ? This has been the source of
> my confusion in the first place.
>
Why not? You're allowed to use adverbials in relative clauses, and {ghorgh}
goes at the beginning of the main sentence. It may or may not be awkward
but I see no reason it would be ungrammatical.
--94eb2c05a384ee6f0205567adba2
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></=
span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8e=
x;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">All of the=
se are indeed wonderful suggestions, but let me ask you something.<div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the original sentence=C2=A0<span s=
tyle=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">{ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI&=
#39; Dalo'bogh Daje' ?}=C2=A0</span>grammatically correct ?</div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Can we have side by side {ghorg=
h} and {DaH} ? This has been the source of my confusion in the first place.=
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why not? You're allowe=
d to use adverbials in relative clauses, and {ghorgh} goes at the beginning=
of the main sentence. It may or may not be awkward but I see no reason it =
would be ungrammatical. <br></div></div></div></div>
--94eb2c05a384ee6f0205567adba2--
--===============1783753964350869493==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1783753964350869493==--
