[110516] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Reversing the order of {-vo'}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (DloraH)
Thu Aug 10 19:13:49 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: DloraH <seruq@bellsouth.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:13:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <d0bc23f8-54c3-2856-9c15-1fda8d25c373@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 12:25 -0400, SuStel wrote:
> On 8/10/2017 11:52 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
...
> *
> *
> > What I'm trying to understand (and the more this thread continues, the
> > "trying" becomes "struggling"), is why -as De'vID wrote- "the pattern
> > is {X-vo' Y-Daq chegh} and not {Y-Daq X-vo' chegh}".
>
> I don't know anything about there being a REASON it can only work that
> way. What I know is what Voragh has already pointed out: we have many
> canonical examples of *X-vo' Y-Daq OVS* and none of *Y-Daq X-vo' OVS.*
> The answer to your question is "that's just the way it is."
For me, a leading -Daq would be the location where the whole [-vo' -Daq
chegh] is taking place.
HoD - [nuqDaq beq? yuQ ghoSta''a'?]
yaS - [jISovchu'be'. yuQ ghoSlaw']
yuQ ghoS HoD. beq nej.
Meanwhile... DujDaq puchpa'vo' vutpa'Daq chegh beq.
- DloraH
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
