[110461] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Reversing the order of {-vo'}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Thu Aug 10 10:37:05 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFK8js2kMeeU-6K3+QhWwvLZMcDo6W726XBf1zccBAtpYtWaJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:37:00 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 10 August 2017 at 14:07, Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...Consider the following:
>> {[vaS'a']vo' [tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach]Daq chegh}
>> {[tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qachDaq vaS'a']vo' chegh}
>
>
> Qo'.
>
> You seem to be suggesting that we parse {tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach} and
> {tera'Daq DIvI' raghom qachDaq vaS'a'} as noun phrases bearing a Type 5
> suffix on the final noun. However, that treatment violates the prohibition
> of a Type 5 suffix on the first noun of such a phrase.
>
> I will not consider them further.
That's not what I intended to suggest. I'm trying to get mayqel
qunenoS to see why the pattern is {X-vo' Y-Daq chegh} and not {Y-Daq
X-vo' chegh}.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
