[110344] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] neH after nouns with type 5 suffixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Mon Aug 7 09:53:23 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:53:18 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNxp3cMuCOGpyz9R=gj-0P8uQVyPCrmeiALPabjdHhzMw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey
'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh.
[translation not available] (NASM: X-15)
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey.
Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but
the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
--Voragh
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of De'vID
On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>>
>> Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH
>> Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
>
>
> I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
