[110292] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] HeghmoH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Fri Aug 4 02:41:56 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFgJOr2TnPh699N0sOV=1rMmm1aq8-_h0E6WeJURdcy5Ohd2ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:41:51 +0300
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
I understand the replies given so far, however I can't understand the
reason which prohibits the full use of {HeghmoH} as a be-verb, i.e.
its use in the way of {tera' yav 'atlhqam HeghmoH} for "fatal
mushroom".
Is this happening because of the presence of {-moH} ?
qunnoq
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Brent Kesler
<brent.of.all.people@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:57 AM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If a first officer assassinates a captain for weakness, you'd say HoD HoH
>> yaS wa'DIch the first officer kills the captain, not HoD HeghmoH yaS wa'DIch
>> the first officer is fatal to the captain, even though the sentence is
>> perfectly grammatical. Again, this is just my opinion.
>
>
> If I heard someone say HoD HeghmoH yaS wa'DIch, I'd assume the first officer
> didn't intend to kill the captain.
>
> HIchDal SeHlawDaq ba'pu' yaS QIp, 'ej HoD HeghmoHpu'. The stupid officer
> sat on the airlock control panel and caused the captain to die.
>
>
> Or maybe that he didn't kill the captain directly.
>
> QuSpu' cheng Sa', 'ej Qang HeghmoH. General Chang conspired and caused
> the chancellor to die.
>
>
> bI'reng
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
