[110287] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Hoch and HochHom variations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Thu Aug 3 14:30:43 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:30:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cK53vtDN+v4NnDQVb1zCpSbCjUsA0bp4Hx52TcKU8wUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0947139467962371048==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------5ED83E5A8CB7FA9D07F6A981"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------5ED83E5A8CB7FA9D07F6A981
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 8/3/2017 1:44 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> SuStel:
>> I suppose HochHom chab could mean almost all the pies, taken individually.
> Would you say that "almost all the pies, taken individually" applies
> for {HochHom chabmey} as well ?
I'm not SAYING that at all. I'm making vague guesses. But, following the
pattern of *Hoch X[mey],* if the plural suffix is present, it implies
they are not taken individually. If it is not present, they are taken
individually.
> SuStel:
>> Almost all the pies, and almost all the pies, taken individually, mean the same things, except some pies are left out.
> Some pies are left out from the "Almost all the pies", or from the
> "almost all the pies, taken individually" ? Or from both ?
Both. We're talking *HochHom,* not *Hoch.*
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------5ED83E5A8CB7FA9D07F6A981
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/3/2017 1:44 PM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cK53vtDN+v4NnDQVb1zCpSbCjUsA0bp4Hx52TcKU8wUDQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">I suppose HochHom chab could mean almost all the pies, taken individually.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Would you say that "almost all the pies, taken individually" applies
for {HochHom chabmey} as well ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I'm not SAYING that at all. I'm making vague guesses. But,
following the pattern of <b>Hoch X[mey],</b> if the plural suffix
is present, it implies they are not taken individually. If it is
not present, they are taken individually.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cK53vtDN+v4NnDQVb1zCpSbCjUsA0bp4Hx52TcKU8wUDQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">Almost all the pies, and almost all the pies, taken individually, mean the same things, except some pies are left out.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Some pies are left out from the "Almost all the pies", or from the
"almost all the pies, taken individually" ? Or from both ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Both. We're talking <b>HochHom,</b> not <b>Hoch.</b><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------5ED83E5A8CB7FA9D07F6A981--
--===============0947139467962371048==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0947139467962371048==--
