[109953] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] same sex marriage

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Fri Jul 14 15:40:21 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 19:40:18 +0000
In-Reply-To: <7552159.13995.1500025883171.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

Anthony Appleyard:
> Can {tlhogh} be a verb? I have it listed only as a noun.

It is now, or rather, it is again.  Think of it like the old-fashioned verb "wed" in English.  From Lieven's message yesterday:

  Maltz says that, more and more, he's hearing an older
  word, {tlhogh}. ... The noun {tlhogh} is quite common.
  It means "marriage," and it can be used for anybody
  marrying anybody. The verb {tlhogh}, however, was long
  considered quaint or archaic.

Which is why only the noun was listed in TKD.  Apparently it's making a comeback or, rather, it will be making a comeback (in the 24th century).  To quote Chief O'Brien, "I hate temporal mechanics!"  <g>  


--
Voragh

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post