[109940] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] mej
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Fri Jul 14 09:10:38 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:10:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+xCZzmmqiez3jma+o+sUv6fwKQv-5_JCEw_3PcpNUrKw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============3774856292812518832==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------23F42421D89D1C5F16F58A67"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------23F42421D89D1C5F16F58A67
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 7/14/2017 4:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> On another thread I noticed that both qurgh and lieven wrote:
>
> qurgh:
> > tetlhvam mejpu'.
> lieven:
> > tetlhvam mejta'chugh
>
> I can understand that these obviously mean "this list she left", and
> "if she has left this list" respectively.
>
> But just to make certain, I neen to ask: Couldn't we also write
> {tetlhvamvo' mejpu'} and {tetlhvamvo' mejta'chugh} ?
This is basically the "verbs of motion" argument all over again, only
this time the verb's object contains an inherent "away from" meaning. I
see no problem with it.
Apparently, Okrand has never used an object with *mej,* so it's
difficult to know for sure.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------23F42421D89D1C5F16F58A67
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/14/2017 4:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+xCZzmmqiez3jma+o+sUv6fwKQv-5_JCEw_3PcpNUrKw@mail.gmail.com">On
another thread I noticed that both qurgh and lieven wrote:
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">qurgh:</span>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif"><span
style="font-size:13.696px">> tetlhvam mejpu'.</span><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif">lieven:<span
style="font-size:13.696px"><br>
</span></div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif"><font
face="sans-serif">> </font>tetlhvam mejta'chugh</div>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I can understand that these obviously mean "this
list she left", and "if she has left this list" respectively.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But just to make certain, I neen to ask: Couldn't
we also write {tetlhvamvo' mejpu'} and {tetlhvamvo' mejta'chugh}
?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is basically the "verbs of motion" argument all over again,
only this time the verb's object contains an inherent "away from"
meaning. I see no problem with it.</p>
<p>Apparently, Okrand has never used an object with <b>mej,</b> so
it's difficult to know for sure.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------23F42421D89D1C5F16F58A67--
--===============3774856292812518832==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============3774856292812518832==--
