[109784] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] qep'a' webpage

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Wed Jul 5 13:52:42 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:52:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR16MB18507CF52BEEC4C86356F4C5A4D40@DM5PR16MB1850.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============3589526480536077282==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------12A1DDAB36319578FF5830F4"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------12A1DDAB36319578FF5830F4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 7/5/2017 1:26 PM, David Holt wrote:
>
> ghItlh mayqel qunenoS:
>
> >> DaH qep'a' ve'meH bonablaH.
>
>
> >If the {ve'} as a verb of movement follows the same rules with {jaH}, and the sentence 
> refers to a single person, then..
>
> >shouldn't this be {DaH qep'a'Daq Dave'meH bInablaH} or {DaH qep'a' Da'vemeH bInablaH} ?
>
>
> Since the {bo-} prefix is used on the main verb, the sentence is not 
> referring to a single person.  To be safe, this should be, {DaH 
> qep'a'Daq bove'meH bonablaH}.  The {-Daq} is actually optional and 
> should not be a point of contention or argument.
>
It's not that it's optional; it's that it's redundant. Let me use an 
example that makes it clear what is an object and what isn't (assuming 
*ve'* works like *jaH*).

*jIH muve'
*/he travels to me
/I am his destination. *jIH* is the object of *ve'.*

*jIHDaq ve'
*/he travels on me
/He's riding on my back, or something like that. The destination is 
unstated. You can tell that *jIHDaq* is not the object of *ve'* because 
the verb prefix agrees with /he/she/it/they/none./

*jIHDaq muve'
*/he travels to at-me; he travels to me-as-location
/This is grammatical; you're just marking /me/ explicitly as a location. 
The verb prefix agrees with *jIHDaq* and shows that that's its object. 
But since *ve'* includes the notion that its object is a location, this 
is redundant. I have tried to reproduce its effect in the English 
translation above. The Klingon is more formally grammatically correct 
than the English.

Unfortunately, the line from the movie is simply *jIve'.* We don't 
actually know whether it is a "verb of motion" or not. Since it is 
compared to *leng,* which is a verb of motion, my money is on *ve'* 
being one too.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------12A1DDAB36319578FF5830F4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/5/2017 1:26 PM, David Holt wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM5PR16MB18507CF52BEEC4C86356F4C5A4D40@DM5PR16MB1850.namprd16.prod.outlook.com">
      <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
          sans-serif;">ghItlh mayqel qunenoS:</span></p>
      <div>
        <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
        </div>
        <div>
          <div dir="auto">
            <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px;
              margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: calibri, arial,
              helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17.12px;">
              <span style="font-size:12pt">&gt;&gt; DaH qep'a' ve'meH
                bonablaH.</span></p>
            <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px;
              margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: calibri, arial,
              helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17.12px;">
              <span style="font-size:17.12px"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px;
              margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: calibri, arial,
              helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17.12px;">
              <span style="font-size:17.12px">&gt;If the {ve'} as a verb
                of movement follows the same rules with {jaH}, and the
                sentence refers to a single person, then..</span></p>
            <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px;
              margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: calibri, arial,
              helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17.12px;">
              <span style="font-size: 17.12px;">&gt;shouldn't this be
                {DaH qep'a'Daq Dave'meH bInablaH} or {DaH qep'a'
                Da'vemeH bInablaH} ?</span><br>
            </p>
            <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px;
              margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: calibri, arial,
              helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17.12px;">
              <span style="font-size:17.12px"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><font
                face="calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span
                  style="font-size: 17.12px;">Since the {bo-} prefix is
                  used on the main verb, the sentence is not
                  referring to a single person.  To be safe, this should
                  be, {DaH qep'a'Daq bove'meH bonablaH}.  The {-Daq} is
                  actually optional and should not be a point of
                  contention or argument.</span></font></p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>It's not that it's optional; it's that it's redundant. Let me use
      an example that makes it clear what is an object and what isn't
      (assuming <b>ve'</b> works like <b>jaH</b>).</p>
    <p><b>jIH muve'<br>
      </b><i>he travels to me<br>
      </i>I am his destination. <b>jIH</b> is the object of <b>ve'.</b><br>
    </p>
    <p><b>jIHDaq ve'<br>
      </b><i>he travels on me<br>
      </i>He's riding on my back, or something like that. The
      destination is unstated. You can tell that <b>jIHDaq</b> is not
      the object of <b>ve'</b> because the verb prefix agrees with <i>he/she/it/they/none.</i></p>
    <p><b>jIHDaq muve'<br>
      </b><i>he travels to at-me; he travels to me-as-location<br>
      </i>This is grammatical; you're just marking <i>me</i> explicitly
      as a location. The verb prefix agrees with <b>jIHDaq</b> and
      shows that that's its object. But since <b>ve'</b> includes the
      notion that its object is a location, this is redundant. I have
      tried to reproduce its effect in the English translation above.
      The Klingon is more formally grammatically correct than the
      English.</p>
    <p>Unfortunately, the line from the movie is simply <b>jIve'.</b>
      We don't actually know whether it is a "verb of motion" or not.
      Since it is compared to <b>leng,</b> which is a verb of motion,
      my money is on <b>ve'</b> being one too.<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------12A1DDAB36319578FF5830F4--

--===============3589526480536077282==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============3589526480536077282==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post