[109722] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] What is a sentence?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Sat Jun 10 20:41:33 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:41:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <83c321bb-37e7-3f86-68e1-06c750a9505c@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============3099297355603498955==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------B47A5871A2AF3C30D56D6EC5"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------B47A5871A2AF3C30D56D6EC5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 6/10/2017 7:51 PM, SuStel wrote:
> Compound sentences are described thus in TKD: "Two sentences may be 
> joined together to form a longer compound sentence. Both sentences 
> must be able to stand alone as properly formed sentences." Now see 
> this from KGT: *juDev 'ej Dujvam ra'wI' DagheS 'e' vItlhob*/I ask you 
> to lead us as commander of this ship./ In order for this canonical 
> utterance to be legal according to TKD, *juDev* and *Dujvam ra'wI' 
> DagheS 'e' vItlhob* must both be "properly formed sentences."

I'm going to take this one back. The formation is apparently *[juDev 'ej 
Dujvam ra'wI' DagheS] 'e' vItlhob,* which makes a compound sentence the 
first sentence of the SAO.

In compensation, I'll point out an example of using a purpose clause on 
an SAO: *bIQapqu'meH tar DaSop 'e' DatIvnIS*/to really succeed, you must 
enjoy eating poison./ This is *bIQapqu'meH [tar DaSop 'e' DatIvnIS],* 
not *[**bIQapqu'meH tar DaSop] 'e' DatIvnIS/./*

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------B47A5871A2AF3C30D56D6EC5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/10/2017 7:51 PM, SuStel wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:83c321bb-37e7-3f86-68e1-06c750a9505c@trimboli.name"
      type="cite">Compound sentences are described thus in TKD: "Two
      sentences may be joined together to form a longer compound
      sentence. Both sentences must be able to stand alone as properly
      formed sentences." Now see this from KGT: <b>juDev 'ej Dujvam
        ra'wI' DagheS 'e' vItlhob</b><i> I ask you to lead us as
        commander of this ship.</i> In order for this canonical
      utterance to be legal according to TKD, <b>juDev</b> and <b>Dujvam
        ra'wI' DagheS 'e' vItlhob</b> must both be "properly formed
      sentences."</blockquote>
    <br>
    <p>I'm going to take this one back. The formation is apparently <b>[juDev
        'ej Dujvam ra'wI' DagheS] 'e' vItlhob,</b> which makes a
      compound sentence the first sentence of the SAO.</p>
    <p>In compensation, I'll point out an example of using a purpose
      clause on an SAO: <b>bIQapqu'meH tar DaSop 'e' DatIvnIS</b><i> to
        really succeed, you must enjoy eating poison.</i> This is <b>bIQapqu'meH
        [tar DaSop 'e' DatIvnIS],</b> not <b>[</b><b>bIQapqu'meH tar
        DaSop] 'e' DatIvnIS<i>.</i></b><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------B47A5871A2AF3C30D56D6EC5--

--===============3099297355603498955==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============3099297355603498955==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post