[109713] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] What is a sentence?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Fri Jun 9 15:03:51 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:03:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CALPi+eTfNMxTCB8kithUa0+5kmsfsKg1ga6o_EbXvoW-ygp53g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============5804157891714798637==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------4E45359D39E2EA404F9C650F"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------4E45359D39E2EA404F9C650F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 6/9/2017 2:45 PM, qurgh lungqIj wrote:
> It seems that Okrand switches back and forth on this one. In TKD he 
> clearly defines them as two sentences and repeats that convention 
> multiple times throughout that section:

Oh sure. I'm not saying that an SAO isn't two sentences. It clearly is. 
I'm saying that it's a sentence composed of sentences. It's both one 
sentence and two. I'm not interested in what the "right" terminology is 
here, just whether SAOs as whole entities have the properties of sentences.

The exact properties of complex sentences of any given type are not 
revealed by making this statement, but it opens the possibility of 
things like attaching relative clauses to SAOs or adding adverbials, 
syntactic nouns, or time expressions to the front of them, and in all 
cases referring to the SAO as a whole, rather than just one part of it. 
For instance, Captain Klaa's utterance *reH DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH* /I've 
always wanted to fight a Federation ship/ becomes perfectly reasonable 
without any special grammatical exceptions if we simply look at it as 
*reH [DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH],* where the brackets delineate a sentence, 
not just a "construction." You can put adverbials at the beginning of 
sentences and other verbal clauses. If you can't call that a sentence, 
you have to explain why you can add *reH* to the front of it, or else 
you've got *[reH DIvI' Duj vISuv] [vIneH]*/I want to always fight a 
Federation ship,/ where the brackets delineate the first and second 
sentences, and the meaning is wrong.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------4E45359D39E2EA404F9C650F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/9/2017 2:45 PM, qurgh lungqIj
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALPi+eTfNMxTCB8kithUa0+5kmsfsKg1ga6o_EbXvoW-ygp53g@mail.gmail.com">It
      seems that Okrand switches back and forth on this one. In TKD he
      clearly defines them as two sentences and repeats that convention
      multiple times throughout that section:</blockquote>
    <p>Oh sure. I'm not saying that an SAO isn't two sentences. It
      clearly is. I'm saying that it's a sentence composed of sentences.
      It's both one sentence and two. I'm not interested in what the
      "right" terminology is here, just whether SAOs as whole entities
      have the properties of sentences.</p>
    <p>The exact properties of complex sentences of any given type are
      not revealed by making this statement, but it opens the
      possibility of things like attaching relative clauses to SAOs or
      adding adverbials, syntactic nouns, or time expressions to the
      front of them, and in all cases referring to the SAO as a whole,
      rather than just one part of it. For instance, Captain Klaa's
      utterance <b>reH DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH</b> <i>I've always wanted
        to fight a Federation ship</i> becomes perfectly reasonable
      without any special grammatical exceptions if we simply look at it
      as <b>reH [DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH],</b> where the brackets
      delineate a sentence, not just a "construction." You can put
      adverbials at the beginning of sentences and other verbal clauses.
      If you can't call that a sentence, you have to explain why you can
      add <b>reH</b> to the front of it, or else you've got <b>[reH
        DIvI' Duj vISuv] [vIneH]</b><i> I want to always fight a Federation
        ship,</i> where the brackets delineate the first and second
      sentences, and the meaning is wrong.</p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------4E45359D39E2EA404F9C650F--

--===============5804157891714798637==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============5804157891714798637==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post