[109334] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] mu' chu' chabal tetlh!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Sat Mar 25 10:30:36 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:30:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1490449162817.2015@kth.se>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============7018271665687577157==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------C78A58ADB76DAF55486258F3"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------C78A58ADB76DAF55486258F3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 3/25/2017 9:39 AM, Felix Malmenbeck wrote:
>
> == DISCUSSION ONLY ==
>
>
> > We can say *DorDI' Hogh* and we generally accept *taghDI' Hogh,*
>
> > so I'm not devastated by this lack. (I wouldn't mind a verb for/
> /
>
> /> begin [a period of time does this]/.)
>
>
> There is quite a lot of canon support for {tagh} having a dual syntax:
>
>
> *tagh *[event]. = "[Event] begins."
>
> [event] *tagh* [agent]. = "[Agent] starts [event]."
>
I'm not referring to dual syntax; I mean *tagh* is glossed /begin a
process, initiate,/ which might suggest that it refers only to processes
or events, not to time periods. All of the examples of *tagh* you
provided refer to events or processes, except possibly *tagh
HarghchuqmeH poH,* which is a time period defined by an event. The
question is, does a week "start a process, initiate"?
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------C78A58ADB76DAF55486258F3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/25/2017 9:39 AM, Felix Malmenbeck
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1490449162817.2015@kth.se" type="cite">
<p>== DISCUSSION ONLY ==</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>> We can say <strong>DorDI' Hogh</strong> and we generally
accept <strong>taghDI' Hogh,</strong></p>
<p>> so I'm not devastated by this lack. (I wouldn't mind a
verb for<em><br>
</em></p>
<p><em>> begin [a period of time does this]</em>.)<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>There is quite a lot of canon support for {tagh} having a dual
syntax:<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><strong>tagh </strong>[event]. = "[Event] begins."</p>
<p>[event] <strong>tagh</strong> [agent]. = "[Agent] starts
[event]."</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I'm not referring to dual syntax; I mean <b>tagh</b> is glossed
<i>begin a process, initiate,</i> which might suggest that it
refers only to processes or events, not to time periods. All of
the examples of <b>tagh</b> you provided refer to events or
processes, except possibly <strong>tagh HarghchuqmeH poH,</strong>
which is a time period defined by an event. The question is, does
a week "start a process, initiate"?<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------C78A58ADB76DAF55486258F3--
--===============7018271665687577157==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============7018271665687577157==--
