[109071] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlhDaq mu'tlhegh

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Thu Feb 23 17:45:02 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHgxQO30FzNXZSXM4GccgzJn9m54nhL7tgwVKu5V79jtw5cVmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:39:05 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

On 22 February 2017 at 00:55, Brian Cote
<wearetheinformation00@gmail.com> wrote:
> DaHjaj <<paq'batlh>> vIlaDqa' 'ej mu'tlheghvam vItu':
>
> "quv vuv nuv pagh ghajbogh neH"
> /Honor is for those with nothing to loose!/
> (paq'raD 19:15)
>
> muj mu'tlheghvam pab 'e' vIHar, qar'a'?

I think it's an instance of apposition... maybe.

It's probably just bending the rules to get the rhyming pattern of
{quv vuv nuv}.

> vaj vIlughmoH 'ej mu'tlheghvam vIlIng:
>
> "quv vuv pagh ghajbogh neH nuv'e'"

I think the {neH} should follow {nuv}, in the meaning that you want.
You want to say "only someone who has nothing" not "someone who merely
has nothing".

-- 
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post